[ad_1]
Judge A.B. Sharma commented on the arguments made by the accused. It has been said by the accused that it is not enough that he married the concerned woman. It is said that this matter is not enough to reject the evidence. Even though the accused and the complainant were married and had a child, the accused could not be released, said AB. Sharma said.
The judge said that it is necessary to give minimum punishment for justice. The judge remarked that the complainant woman and the accused were married. The judge said that the punishment was given keeping in mind the gravity of the crime. The judge said that since the accused has no old record and his age is 31 years, there is no need for maximum punishment in this case.
When the Sessions Court sentenced the accused, the complainant in 2017 and his current wife and child were also present for the hearing. After the court sentenced her to three and a half years, she burst into tears. She said that the husband is the breadwinner of the family. The court has also sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs.
Special public prosecutor Geeta Sharma argued that the evidence in the case should not be ignored. Sharma argued that the court should set an example by punishing in this case. Accused’s lawyer S.K. Ali and Shabi Fatima should note that the accused had spent 18 months in jail before the charge sheet was filed, he is married to the victim. He said that the court should consider this.
The victim informed that the incident took place on August 15, 2017. She was having an affair with the accused for six months at that time. Her family members also knew about their love affair. However, as he was unemployed, the family was not ready for the marriage. So he took her to his tailoring shop and attempted to rape her. She saved herself with the help of a blade found there. After this incident, she and her family filed a complaint. Later, she filed a complaint in 2021. After some time, the accused and the victim got married.
[ad_2]
For Latest Updates! Read Bombay Today